Dead Letter Office -DLO |
Stampsjoann (click here) |
Handling Fees for Dead
Letter Services
The intent of the Dead Letter Office page is to illustrate covers that
show the fees that were required to return certain letters from the
Dead Letter Office (DLO). The emphasis is on the fees that were charged
to return or forward dead letters, not an amount that might have caused
a letter to be short paid by the sender.
Handling undeliverable mail seems to have occurred from the beginnings of the General Post Office (Post Office Department) in the 1700s. David L. Straight states in his Stamp Collector article of July 14, 2003, that the position of Inspector of Dead Letters was created by Congress in 1777. Dead letters are letters that could not be delivered to the addressees and no return address is on the envelope. If unclaimed by the sender, they were sent to the DLO. In the 1817 Postal Laws & Instructions, such unclaimed letters were called "Dead Letters."
In 1825, the DLO became a Post Office division. A postal act approved on March 3, 1825 was the basic act governing the disposition of dead letters until 1862. The act summed up previous acts of 1799, 1810, and 1817. Following is Section 26 of that act. ( Graham, Richard B., The Dead Letter Office Until 1851, The Chronicle 145, Feb 1990, No 3, Vol 42.)
(click
image for 300 dpi scan)
|
It was about 1861 when specially imprinted envelopes began to be
used by the DLO. The fee, if any to be paid, was often printed on the
envelope.
6¢
An act of Congress approved January 21, 1862, provided that ordinary
letters that were returned receive a 6¢ charge. The 6¢
covered one rate for return (being sent to) the DLO and one rate for
return to the writer or owner. An additional 3¢ would be charged
for valuable letters since these required being registered at the DLO.
Valuable meant the envelope contained something other than written
correspondence.
![]() (Click image for 300 dpi scan) |
3¢
Effective July 1, 1863, the charge to return a dead letter was 3¢,
due to a postal act passed on March 3, 1863.
![]() (Click image for 300dpi scan) |
![]() (Click image for 300 dpi scan) |
![]() (Click image for 300 dpi scan) |
5¢
On July 1, 1935, the DLO return fee became 5¢. This rate continued
for over thirty years until June 30, 1958. The message regarding the
5¢ fee states specifically that letters with the sender's name and
address would not be sent to the DLO, but be returned to the sender.
![]() (Click image for 300 dpi scan) |
10¢
On July 1, 1958, the return fee was raised to 10¢. This fee was in
force until April 17, 1976.
![]() (Click image for 300 dpi scan) |
13¢
From April 18, 1976 to July 17th of the same year, the DLO
return fee was 13¢. Covers showing that fee during the short rate
period are not easily found.
As indicated, the total due on this cover was 26¢, the 13¢ handling fee plus the 13¢ postage due originally. Perhaps an employee submitting expenses to the company sent it. The backdate of July 2, 1976 is from Phoenix, AZ. The cover was probably sent to the company to pay the fee and amount due.
![]() (click image for 300 dpi scan) |
20¢
The 20¢ handling rate was in effect from July 18, 1976 to May 28,
1978. This cover required payment of 33¢, 13¢ postage due and
20¢ handling fee for the DLO to open the envelope looking for a
return address. It has an "Officially Sealed" label indicating handling
by the United States Postal Service (USPS). It was probably forwarded
to Mr. and Mrs. Stein who would/may have paid the 33¢ to receive
the cover.
![]() (Click image for 300 dpi scan) |
40¢
From May 29, 1978 to March 21, 1981, the return handling fee from a DLO
was 40¢. This is another example of a short paid letter that was
sent to a DLO. Tape at the top shows that the envelope was opened but
no return address was found. The cover would have been sent to the
addressee for possible acceptance and payment of the 15¢ postage
due plus the DLO handling fee of 40¢.
![]() (Click image for 300 dpi scan) |
![]() (Click image for 300 dpi scan) |
As of February 17, 1985, no handling fee was charged if a cover was opened due to improper addressing or no address showing. If after being opened, it was able to be forward to the addressee, that recipient would be charged only for any postage due. In this case 29¢ was charged for delivery of a piece of mail sent unfranked.
![]() (Click image for 300 dpi scan) |
![]() (Click image for 300 dpi scan) |
Stampsjoann (click here) |